Happiness and the Art of Life: Diagnosing the psychopolitics of wellbeing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/hcs.2013.147Keywords:
positive psychology, affect, joy, governmentality, wellbeingAbstract
Building upon the idea of a psychology without foundations and on vitalist approaches to health, the paper presents the concepts of ‘joy’ and of ‘gay science’ as theoretical points of contrast to Seligman’s ‘happiness’ and ‘positive psychology’. Defined by Spinoza and Nietzsche as the feeling of becoming more active in the world, joy emphasises the embodied connection between self and world. By contrast, we propose, a defining characteristic of the contemporary happiness dispositif is precisely the feature of splitting the subject from their world; of treating feelings and desires as purely internal, individual and subjective affairs; and of effectively cutting people off from any of their powers that do not correspond to a limited mode of entrepeneurial subjectivity and practice.
References
Abramson, L.Y., Seligman, M.E.P., and Teasdale, J.D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49-74.
Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009.
Barry, A., Osborne, T., Rose, N. (eds) (1996). Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neoliberalism, and rationalities of government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bok, D. (2010). The politics of happiness: What governments can learn from the new research on well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brown, S.D. (2001) Psychology and the art of living. Theory and Psychology, 11 (2), 171-192.
Author (2008). Psychology without foundations: History, philosophy and psychosocial theory. London: Sage.
Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Canguilhem, G. (1989 [1966]). The normal and the pathological. New York: Zone Books.
Christopher, J. C., & Hickinbottom, S. (2008). Positive psychology, ethnocentrism, and the disguised ideology of individualism. Theory & Psychology, 18, 563–589.
Chrystal, K.A. and Mizen P.D. (2003). Goodhart's law: Its origins, meaning and implications for monetary policy. In Paul D. Mizen (ed.), Central banking, monetary theory and practice: Essays in honour of Charles Goodhart (vol. 1) (pp. 221-243). Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
Cromby, J. (2011). The greatest gift: Happiness, psychology and governance. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(11), 840-852.
Cruickshanks, B. (1996). Revolutions within: Self government and self-esteem. In A. Barry, T. Osborne and N. Rose (eds) Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neoliberalism, and rationalities of government (pp. 231-252). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dean, H. (2010). Understanding human need. Bristol: Policy Press.
Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control, OCTOBER 59, Winter 1992, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp.3-7.
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Du Gay, P. (1995). Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.
Easterbrook, G. (2003). The progress paradox. New York: Random House.
Edgeworth, F.Y. (1881). Mathematical psychics: An essay on the application of mathematics to the moral sciences. London: C.K. Paul.
Edwards, C. and Imrie, R. (2008). Disability and the implications of the wellbeing agenda: Some reflections from the United Kingdom. Journal of Social Policy, 37(3), 337-355.
Ehrenreich. B. (2010). Smile or die: How positive thinking fooled America and the world. London: Granta.
Foucault, M. (1977). The confessions of the flesh. In Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings. London: Longman.
Foucault, M. (1987). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality volume 2. (R. Hurley trans). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Frey, B. S. and Stutzer, A. (2007). Should national happiness be maximized? Working paper no. 306 of the Institute for empirical research in economics, University of Zurich. Available at http://www.zora.uzh.ch/31973/
Furedi, F. (2004). Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age, London: Routledge.
Author (1993). Psychosomatic subjects and the ‘duty to be well’: Personal agency within medical rationality. Economy & Society, 22(3), 357-372.
Author (1998). Inconspicuous anomalies: Alexithymia and ethical relations to the self. Health, 5(4), 472-492.
Author (2009). On the art of life: A vitalist reading of medical humanities. In J. Latimer and M. Schillmeier (Eds.), Un/knowing bodies (pp. 25-45). Sociological Review Monographs. Oxford: Blackwell.
Haidt, J. (2006). The happiness hypothesis: Putting ancient wisdom to the test of modern science? London: Arrow Books.
Held, B. (2004). The negative side of positive psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 44, 9–46.
Higgins, W. (2007). How are we governed now: Neo-liberalism, governmentality and the nullification of substantive policy. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 57, 1-29.
Higgins, W. and Halstroem, K. (2007). Standardization, globalization and rationalities of government. Organization, 14 (5), 685-704.
Horney, K. (1991 [1950]). Neurosis and human growth: The struggle towards self-realization. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Isin, E. (2004). The neurotic citizen. Citizenship Studies, 8(3), 217-235.
Keynes, J. M. (1930/2009). Economic possibilities for our grandchildren. In J. M. Keynes (Ed.), Essays in persuasion. New York: Classic House Books.
Kidd, J. (2008). Mental capital and wellbeing: Making the most of ourselves in the 21st century. Published by the Government Office for Science, available at http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/foresight/docs/mental-capital/sr-c10_mcw.pdf (accessed on 10/10/2013).
Latour, B. (2005) What is given in experience? Boundary 2, 32(1), 223-237.
Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Allen Lane.
Morris, I. (2009). Teaching happiness and wellbeing in schools: Learning to ride elephants. London: Network Continuum Education.
Myers, D. (2000). The American paradox. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Nettle, D. (2005). Happiness: The science behind your smile.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Newman, M. (2010). Get happy and get on with it, Times Higher Education, January, 2010 available at http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=410055 (accessed on 10/10/2013).
Nietzsche, F. (1968). The will to power. (trans. W. Kaufmann & R.J. Hollingdale). New York: Vintage Books.
Nietzsche, F. (1969). On the genealogy of morals (trans. W. Kaufmann). New York: Vintage Books.
Power, M. (1999). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N. (2006). Disorders without borders? The expanding scope of psychiatric practice. BioSocieties, 1: 465-484.
Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice. London: Harper.
Seligman, M. (1998) The President’s address from the 1998 APA Annual Report, available on http://www.ppc.sas.upenn.edu/aparep98.htm (accessed on 10/10/2013)
Seligman, M. (1998). President’s Address from The APA 1998 Annual Report, appearing in the August, 1999 American Psychologist.
Seligman, M. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Simon and Shuster.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology [Special issue]. American Psychologist, 55(1).
Knowledge@Wharton (2009) ‘Psychological capital’: How employees personality traits can contribute to the bottom line, available at http://www.wharton.universia.net/index.cfm?fa=viewArticle&id=1756&language=english (accessed on 10/10/2013)
Slife, B. D., & Richardson, F. C. (2008). Problematic ontological underpinnings of positive psychology: A strong relational alternative. Theory and Psychology, 18(5), 699–723.
Sointu, E. (2005). The rise of an ideal: tracing changing discourses of wellbeing. Sociological Review, 52(2), 255–74.
Author (2013). Affectivity, Informática na Educação: Teoria e prática, 16(1), 49-70
Author (2011). Psychology in the key of life: Deep empiricism and process ontology. In P. Stenner, J. Cromby, J. Motzkau, & J. Yen, (Eds.), Theoretical psychology: Global transformations and challenges. Concord, Ontario, Canada: Captus Press.
Author (2008). Psychosocial welfare: Reflections on an emerging field. Critical Social Policy, 28(4), 415-437.
Taylor, D. (2011). Wellbeing and welfare: A psychosocial analysis of being well and doing well enough, Journal of Social Policy, 40(4), 777-794.
Whitehead, A. N. (1985 [1925]). Science and the modern world. London: Free Association Books.
Whitehead, A.N. (1935). Adventures of ideas. London: Cambridge University Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1968 [1938]). Modes of Thought. New York: The Free Press.
Yen, J. (2010). Authorizing happiness: Rhetorical demarcation of science and society in historical narratives of positive psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 30(2), 67-78.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.