How the Practicing Physician Encounters Human Rights in Daily Clinical Situations

Authors

  • A. Rosiek Anna Rosiek is a researcher with Ross-Medica S.C
  • K. Leksowski Department of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, the Military Clinical Hospital, Powstańców, Warsaw, Poland.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/hcs.2013.110

Keywords:

Patient Rights, Human Rights, Medical Ethics

Abstract

Our study shows the awareness and application of the concept of  human rights (understood as patient rights) in a hospital environment. We sought to determine whether such rights are respected, soliciting the opinion of patients and as to how it acts as a measure for whether service delivery is wholly effective in the conext of the clinician-patient relation. Our research was undertaken to signal a contemporary need in service delivery: health personnel involved in the delivery of surgical services have much to learn from the practical applications of human rights principles and the essential role they must fulfill in research and advocacy in order to improve the availability of surgical care globally.

Human rights, medical ethics and empathy are parallel mechanisms working at the level of the patient-clinician relationship. This, in general, can influence the quality of care and communication for the better.

Our study was conducted in 2011 and lasted 6 months. The research sites were the public hospitals located in the Kujavian-Pomeranian region of Poland. There were  two classes of hospitals: the first, had more than 400 beds (Group I) and the second one: above 400 beds (Group II). We solicted the opinion of 180 patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The main planned outcome (hypothesis zero) of the study was that there were no differences between the two Groups of hospitals, and therefore no substantial variance in service delivery. The Mann-Whitney U test evidenced that judging by the significance level (p > 0.05), there is no basis for rejecting hypothesis zero.

 

Author Biographies

A. Rosiek, Anna Rosiek is a researcher with Ross-Medica S.C

Anna Rosiek is Ph.D. Ross-Medica s.c;

K. Leksowski, Department of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, the Military Clinical Hospital, Powstańców, Warsaw, Poland.

Krzysztof Leksowski is a Professor with the Department of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery at the Military Clinical Hospital, Powstańców Warszawy. He is also Chair of the Public Health Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.

References

Alexander JA, Hearld LR, Mittler JN, Harvey J. Patient-physician role relationships and patient activation among individuals with chronic illness, Health Services Research, June, 2012

Amnesty International. Human rights defenders. http://www.amnesty.org/en/human-rights-defenders/background (accessed 13 March 2009)

Barry CA et al. Patient’s unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 2000, 320:1245-1050

Bendaputi, N.M., Berry, L L. Frey, K.A., Parish, J.T. (2006). Patients' perspectives on ideal physician behavior. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 81, 338-344

Berg J W, Appelbaum PS, PARKER LS and LIDZ CH W, Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice, 2001, 2d edition, 26-27.

Berry LL et al. Patients’ commitment to their physician and why it matters. Annals of Family Medicine 6 (1): 6-13, 2008

Birhanu Z, Assefa T, Woldie M, Morankar S. Determinants of satisfaction with health care provider interactions at health centres In central Ethiopia: a cross sectional study, BMC Health Service Research 2010, 10:78, 1-12

Burris S, The Invisibility of Public Health: Population-Level Measures in a Politics of Market Individualism, 87 AM. J. PUB. HEALTH 1997, 1607-1608

Charles, C., T. Whelan, and A. Gafni. 1999. "What Do We Mean by Partnership in Making Decisions about Treatment?" British Medical Journal 319: 780-2

Charon, R. Narrative Medicine: A model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. Journal of American Medical Association,2001, 286, 1897-1902

S M Lukhozi, MB BCh, Dip Forensic Med (Clinical), PG Dip Applied Ethics for Professionals, Certificate in Medicine & Law, MFFLM (London) Clinical Forensic Medical Officer, Mamelodi Medico-Legal Crisis Centre, Clinical forensic medicine and human rights – doctors as human rights defenders , December 2009, Vol. 2, No.2

Council of Europe. European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Accessed August 31, 2004

Garrison M, Schneider CE. For years, medical paternalism--the belief that doctors should make decisions for patients--ruled.", The law of bioethics: Individual autonomy and social regulation 41, 2003

General Assembly Resolution A/RES/53/144. Declaration on Human Rights Defenders, adopted 1998 http://www.ohcrh.org/english/issues/defenders/declaration.hm (accessed 23 April 2009)

Geneva Convention. Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949. Accessed August 31, 2004

http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36c8.html

Hodgkin K, The role of the doctor in society, Proc R Soc Med. 1973 September; 66(9):893-896

Institute of Medicine 2001. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A new health system for 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

Kao Audiey C. Medicine and Human Rights, Virtual Mentor, September 2004,Volume 6, Number 9

Kremer, J. F., & Dietzen, L. L. (1991). Two approaches to teaching accurate empathy to undergraduates: Teacher-intensive and self-directed. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 69-75

Lawrence O. Gostin, Health of the People: The Highest Law?, 32 J.L. MED. & ETHICS, 2004, 509:510

Lubetkin EI, Lu W H, Gold M R. Levels and Correlates of Patient Activation in Health Center Settings: Building Strategies for Improving Health Outcomes. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 2010, 21 (3):796:808

Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of empirical literature. Social Science and Medicine 2000, 51:1087-1100

Mishler EG. The discourse of medicine, dialectics of medical interviews. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Nordwood, NJ, 1984

Miller MR, Elixhauser A, Zhan C, et al. Patient safety indicators: Using administrative data to identify potential patient-safety concerns. Health Serv. Res. 2001; 36: 110-32

Moore, P. J., Adler, N. E., & Robertson, P.A. (2000). Medical malpractice: The effect of doctor-patient relations on medical patient perceptions and malpractice intentions. Western Journal of Medicine, 173, 244-250

Peel M. Human rights and medical ethics. J R Soc Med 2005; 98: 171-173

Post R, Informed Consent to Abortion: A First Amendment Analysis of Compelled Physician Speech, 2007 U. ILL. L. REV. 939, 977

Roe, McMurray “Not-so-informed consent: using the doctor-patient relationship to promote state-supported outcomes”,Case Western Reserve Law Review, September, 2009

Sulzer-Azaroff B, Austin J. Does BBS work? Behavior-based safety and injury reduction: A survey of evidence. Prof Saf. 2000; 45: 19-24

Starr P. The Social Transformation of American Medicine, New York: Basic Books, 1982

United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Accessed August 31, 2004

United Nations. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Accessed August 31, 2004

United Nations. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Accessed August 31, 2004

Weeks L.E, The public's right to health: when patient rights threaten the commons, Washington University Law Review, October, 2009

Wendy E. Parmet, Public Health and Constitutional Law: Recognizing the Relationship 10 J. Health Care L & Poly, 2007 13, p 24

Wersch van A, Eccles M. Involvement of costumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines: practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2001, 10:10-16

World Medical Association. Declaration of Tokyo. Accessed August 31, 2004

Zachariae, R., Pedersen, C.G., Jensen, A.B., Ehrnrooth, E., Rossen, P.B., & von der Maase, H. (2003). Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. British Journal of Cancer, 88, 658-665

Downloads

Published

2013-05-17

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2013): Ways of Seeing: Causes and Beliefs

Section

Invited Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.