Learning the Scripts: An exploration of the shared ways in which young Lao volunteers in Vientiane understand happiness.

Authors

  • C. McMellon Centre for Research on Families and Relationships, University of Edinburgh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/hcs.2013.135

Keywords:

happiness, subjective well-being, Laos

Abstract

The idea that development policies need to take account of factors broader than economic growth is increasingly commonplace. A focus upon happiness provides an alternative way of looking at development, but the concept of happiness is far from straightforward. This paper argues that any consideration of happiness in policy must be grounded in nuanced qualitative research that provides a rich understanding of the realities of people's lives and their multiple and often conflicting understandings of what happiness means.

This paper draws on ethnographic research with young Lao volunteers with community-based organisations in Vientiane, Laos, that took place between 2010 and 2012. Drawing on Wierzbicka's (2004) concept of cultural scripts, it identifies, describes and explores three collective scripts that this specific group of young people believe about the things that make them happy:

•         The way to be happy is to be a good Lao person

•         I will be happy if I have the things that I need to be  comfortable and have an easy life

•         I am happy when I follow my heart

Despite illustrating very different understandings of happiness, these stories are woven from a common set of themes about the things that young people think make them happy. Consideration is given to the possible origins of these shared scripts. The discussion section of the paper looks at the implications of these shared scripts for understanding happiness and for the inclusion of a consideration of the concept of happiness in public policy.

The paper ends with three conclusions. Firstly it suggests the importance of rich qualitative research in order to make choices about the meaningful use of well-being indicators. Secondly, in making explicit the socially constructed ways that people understand happiness, such research can also remind us of the need to interrogate the ways that happiness is considered in public policy. Thirdly, the paper suggests that such a critical approach to happiness could also be beneficial at the personal level in order for individuals to challenge and make choices about their own beliefs about happiness.

 

Author Biography

C. McMellon, Centre for Research on Families and Relationships, University of Edinburgh

Christina McMellon is a final year PhD student at Edinburgh University's Centre for Research on Families and Relationships.

References

Asian Trends Monitoring Bulletin (2012). “Vientiane: Poor but different.” Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore. http://www.asiantrendsmonitoring.com/2013/01/02/bulletin-19/

Askew, M., W. S. Logan, et al. (2007). Vientiane: Transformations of a Lao landscape. London & New York, Routledge.

Engstrom, S. & J. Whiting (1996). Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics; Rethinking happiness and duty. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Evans, G. (1998). Politics of Ritual and Remembrance: Laos Since 1975, University of Hawaii Press.

Evans, G. (1999). Laos: Culture and Society, Silkworm Books.

Griffin, J. (2007). "What do happiness studies study?" Journal of Happiness Studies 8: 139-148. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10902-006-9007-4

High, H. (2006). ""Join Together, Work Together, for the Common Good - Solidarity": Village Formation Processes in the Rural South of Laos." Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 21(1): 22-45. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/soj/summary/v021/21.1high.htm

Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative Inquiry: Research into the Human Condition. London, Sage.

Jerndal, R. (1998). "Making space in Laos: constructing a national identity in a 'forgotten' country." Political Geography 17(7). http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/09626298/1998/00000017/00000007/art00028

Kitayama, S. and H. R. Markus (2000). “The pursuit of happiness and the realization of sympathy; cultural patterns of self, social relations, and well-being.” Culture and Subjective Well-being. E. Diener and E. M. Suh. London, MIT Press.

Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press, London.

PADETC (2008). “PADETC: ten years in balance” http://sombathdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/padetc_10_years.pdf (accessed 25/9/13)

Rehbein, B. (2005). “Configurations of Globalisation in Laos and Cambodia: Does faster globalisation mean better development?” http://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/3507/TS%20Pa%20Rehbein.p df?sequence=2 (accessed 24/9/13)

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Sisaleumsak, R. (2012). “Modernity for young migrant women working in garment factories in Vientiane, National University of Laos” (unpublished).

Stuart-Fox, M. (1996). Buddhist Kingdom, Marxist State: The Making of Modern Laos. Bangkok, Whie Lotus.

Triandis, H. C. (2000). “Cultural Syndromes and Subjective Well-being.” Culture and Subjective Well-being. E. Diener and E. M. Suh. London, MIT Press.

Torras, M. (2008). "The subjectivity inherent in objective measures of well-being." Journal of Happiness Studies 9: 475-487. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10902-007-9084-z

Veenhoven, R. (2002). "Why social policy needs subjective indicators." Social Indicators Research 58: 33-45. http://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbssr/fsiii01404.html

Wierzbicka, A. (2004). "'Happiness' in cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspective." Daedalus 133(2): 34-43. http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/001152604323049370

Young, J. (2007). The Vertigo of Late Modernity. London, Sage.

Downloads

Published

2013-11-15

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2013): Translating Happiness: Medicine, Culture and Social Progress

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.