I Did it For Me: Negotiating identity and agency

Authors

  • L Pecot-Hebert DePaul University
  • H Hennink-Kaminski University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/hcs.2012.88

Abstract

Scholars have debated the feminist critique of female beauty practices for years with the fundamental disagreement revolving around the notion of “agency.” This study used textual analysis to explore how the concept of “agency” has been employed in cosmetic surgery ads placed in large city magazines.   Three themes emerged: realize your potential, pleasing yourself, and control your destiny.  This research expands our understanding of how physicians are repositioning cosmetic surgery to women through discourses that empower, appeal to their sense of self, and play upon feminist sensibilities that privilege individual choice. This research also contributes to the literature surrounding the ongoing debate of agency by examining how it plays out in another form of text previously unexamined (physician advertising) and how it touches upon a new player in the health beauty system (physicians) rather than prior studies, which focus on idealized images in the media.

Author Biographies

L Pecot-Hebert, DePaul University

Lisa Pecot-Hébert is an assistant professor at DePaul University and her research area looks at the relationship between gender, body image, and the media.

H Hennink-Kaminski, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Heidi Hennink-Kaminski is an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and her research focuses on social marketing, health communication and ethical issues associated with physician marketing.

References

American Society of Plastic Surgeons.(2011). Plastic surgery procedures. Retrieved from http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Patients_and_Consumers/Procedures.html.

Askegaard, S., Gertsen, MC., Langer, R.(2002). The body consumed: Reflexivity and cosmetic surgery. Psychology & Marketing, 19(10), 793-812.

Author.(2010). The content of cosmetic surgery advertisements placed in large city magazines, 1985-2004. Journal of Current Issues in Advertising Research, 33(2), p. 41-57.

Banet-Weiser, S., Portwood-Stacer, L. (2006). ‘I just want to be me again!’: Beauty pageants, Reality television and post-feminism. Feminist Theory, 7(2), 255-272.

Bartky, SL. (Ed.). (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.

Bordo, S. (2003). Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture and the body (10th ed.).

Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Brooks, A. (2004). “Under the knife and proud of it:” An analysis of the normalization of cosmetic surgery. Critical Sociology, 30(2), 207-239.

Charmaz, K. (2007). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Choi, SM., Rifon, N. (2007). Who is the celebrity in advertising? Understanding dimensions of celebrity images. Journal of Popular Culture, 40(2), 304-327.

Corbin, J., Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Davis, K. (1995). Reshaping the female body. New York and London: Routledge.

Davis, K. (2003). Dubious equalities and embodied differences: Cultural studies on cosmetic surgery. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, Inc.

Douglas, S. (2010). Enlightened sexism: The seductive message that feminism’s work is done. New York: Times Books.

Eisend, M., Langner, T. (2010). Immediate and delayed advertising effects of celebrity endorsers’ attractiveness and expertise. International Journal of Advertising, 29(4), 527-546.

Etcoff, N. (2000). Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty. New York: Random House.

Featherstone, M. (2010). Body, image and affect in consumer culture. Body and Society, 16(1), 193-221.

Foucault, M. (1988a). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Frost, (1999). 'Doing looks': Women, appearance and mental health. In Eds. J. Artursand J. Grimshaw. Women's bodies: Discipline and transgression. London: Cassell.

Foucault, M. (1988b). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview with Michel Foucault. In J. Bernauer & D. Rasmussen (Eds.), The final Foucault (pp. 1-20). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Frank, K. (2006). Agency. Anthropological Theory, 6(3), 281-302.

Fraser, S. (2003). The agent within: Agency repertoires in medical discourse on cosmetic surgery. Australian Feminist Studies, 18(40), 27-44.

Gagné, P., McGaughey, D. (2002). Designing women: Cultural hegemony and the exercise of power among women who have undergone elective mammoplasty. Gender and Society, 16(6), 814-838.

Genz, S., Brabon, B. (2009). Postfeminism: Cultural Texts and Theories. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structurization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Gill, R. (2007a). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147-166.

Gill, R. (2007b). Gender and the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Gillespie, R. (1996). Women, the body and brand extension in medicine: Cosmetic surgery and the paradox of choice. Women and Health, 24(4), 69-85.

Gimlin, D. (2007). Accounting for cosmetic surgery in the USA and Great Britain: A cross-cultural analysis of women’s narratives. Body and Society, 13(1), 41-60.

Gimlin, D. (2010). Imaging the other in cosmetic surgery. Body and Society, 16(4), 57-76.

Goldfarb, V.(1975). Virginia State Bar Association. 421 US 773.

Heyes, C. (2009). Diagnosing culture: Body dysmorphic disorder and cosmetic surgery. Body and Society, 15(4), 73-93.

Jones, M. (2008). Skintight: An anatomy of cosmetic surgery. New York: Berg.

Lewis, T. (2008). Smart living: Lifestyle media and popular expertise. New York: Peter Lang.

Lin, C., Yeh, J. (2009). Comparing society’s awareness of women: Media portrayed idealized images and physical attractiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 61-79.

Markula, P. (2004). Tuning into one’s self: Foucault’s technologies of the self and mindful fitness. Sociology of Sport Journal, 21, 302-321.

McRobbie, A. (2004). Post-feminism and popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 255-264.

McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. London: SAGE Publications.

Morgan, KP. (1991). Women and the knife: Cosmetic surgery and the colonization of women's bodies. In R. Weitz (Ed.), The politics of women's bodies (pp. 147-166).

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ouellette, L. (1999). Inventing the Cosmo Girl: class identity and girl-style American studies. Media, Culture and Society, 21, 359-383.

Ouellette, L.,Hay, J. (2008). Better living through reality TV: Television and post-welfare citizenship. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Ring, A. (1999). Cosmetic surgery magazines: Mass mediating the new face of medical practice. Australian Studies in Journalism, 8, 118-138.

Slevac, J., Tiggemann, M. (2010). Attitudes toward cosmetic surgery in middle-aged women: Body image, aging anxiety, and the media. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(1), 65-74.

Solomon, M. (2004). Consumer behavior: Buying, having, being. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Spilson, SV., Chung, KC., Greenfield, ML., Walters, M.(2002). Are plastic surgery advertisements conforming to the ethical codes of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 109(3), 1181-1186.

Squier, S. (2004). Liminal lives: Imagining the human at the frontiers of biomedicine. Durham: Duke University Press.

Sullivan, D. (2001). Cosmetic surgery: The cutting edge of commercial medicine in America. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.

Tait, S. (2007). Television and the domestication of cosmetic surgery. Feminist Media Studies, 7(2), 119-135.

Tasker, Y., Negra, D.(2007). Interrogating postfeminism: Gender and the politics of popular culture. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Wearing, S. (2007). Subjects of rejuvenation: Aging in postfeminist culture. In Y. Tasker & D. Negra (Eds.), Interrogating postfeminism: Gender and the politics of popular culture. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth. New York, NY: Perennial.

Young, I. (1992). Breasted experience: The look and the feeling. In R. Weitz (Ed.), The politics of women’s bodies: Sexuality, appearance, & behavior (2nd ed.).

New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Yu, H., Jeong, Y., Baek, T., Joo, I. (2009). How much do they care about advertising ethics? A content analysis of plastic surgeons' websites. Internet Journal of Law, Healthcare & Ethics, 6(1).

Downloads

Published

2012-08-14

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2012): Identities

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.