Email this article Learning the Scripts: An exploration of the shared ways in which young Lao volunteers in Vientiane understand happiness.
Abstract
The idea that development policies need to take account of factors broader than economic growth is increasingly commonplace. A focus upon happiness provides an alternative way of looking at development, but the concept of happiness is far from straightforward. This paper argues that any consideration of happiness in policy must be grounded in nuanced qualitative research that provides a rich understanding of the realities of people's lives and their multiple and often conflicting understandings of what happiness means.
This paper draws on ethnographic research with young Lao volunteers with community-based organisations in Vientiane, Laos, that took place between 2010 and 2012. Drawing on Wierzbicka's (2004) concept of cultural scripts, it identifies, describes and explores three collective scripts that this specific group of young people believe about the things that make them happy:
• The way to be happy is to be a good Lao person
• I will be happy if I have the things that I need to be comfortable and have an easy life
• I am happy when I follow my heart
Despite illustrating very different understandings of happiness, these stories are woven from a common set of themes about the things that young people think make them happy. Consideration is given to the possible origins of these shared scripts. The discussion section of the paper looks at the implications of these shared scripts for understanding happiness and for the inclusion of a consideration of the concept of happiness in public policy.
The paper ends with three conclusions. Firstly it suggests the importance of rich qualitative research in order to make choices about the meaningful use of well-being indicators. Secondly, in making explicit the socially constructed ways that people understand happiness, such research can also remind us of the need to interrogate the ways that happiness is considered in public policy. Thirdly, the paper suggests that such a critical approach to happiness could also be beneficial at the personal level in order for individuals to challenge and make choices about their own beliefs about happiness.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asian Trends Monitoring Bulletin (2012). “Vientiane: Poor but different.” Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore. http://www.asiantrendsmonitoring.com/2013/01/02/bulletin-19/
Askew, M., W. S. Logan, et al. (2007). Vientiane: Transformations of a Lao landscape. London & New York, Routledge.
Engstrom, S. & J. Whiting (1996). Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics; Rethinking happiness and duty. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Evans, G. (1998). Politics of Ritual and Remembrance: Laos Since 1975, University of Hawaii Press.
Evans, G. (1999). Laos: Culture and Society, Silkworm Books.
Griffin, J. (2007). "What do happiness studies study?" Journal of Happiness Studies 8: 139-148. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10902-006-9007-4
High, H. (2006). ""Join Together, Work Together, for the Common Good - Solidarity": Village Formation Processes in the Rural South of Laos." Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 21(1): 22-45. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/soj/summary/v021/21.1high.htm
Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative Inquiry: Research into the Human Condition. London, Sage.
Jerndal, R. (1998). "Making space in Laos: constructing a national identity in a 'forgotten' country." Political Geography 17(7). http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/09626298/1998/00000017/00000007/art00028
Kitayama, S. and H. R. Markus (2000). “The pursuit of happiness and the realization of sympathy; cultural patterns of self, social relations, and well-being.” Culture and Subjective Well-being. E. Diener and E. M. Suh. London, MIT Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press, London.
PADETC (2008). “PADETC: ten years in balance” http://sombathdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/padetc_10_years.pdf (accessed 25/9/13)
Rehbein, B. (2005). “Configurations of Globalisation in Laos and Cambodia: Does faster globalisation mean better development?” http://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/3507/TS%20Pa%20Rehbein.p df?sequence=2 (accessed 24/9/13)
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Sisaleumsak, R. (2012). “Modernity for young migrant women working in garment factories in Vientiane, National University of Laos” (unpublished).
Stuart-Fox, M. (1996). Buddhist Kingdom, Marxist State: The Making of Modern Laos. Bangkok, Whie Lotus.
Triandis, H. C. (2000). “Cultural Syndromes and Subjective Well-being.” Culture and Subjective Well-being. E. Diener and E. M. Suh. London, MIT Press.
Torras, M. (2008). "The subjectivity inherent in objective measures of well-being." Journal of Happiness Studies 9: 475-487. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10902-007-9084-z
Veenhoven, R. (2002). "Why social policy needs subjective indicators." Social Indicators Research 58: 33-45. http://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbssr/fsiii01404.html
Wierzbicka, A. (2004). "'Happiness' in cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspective." Daedalus 133(2): 34-43. http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/001152604323049370
Young, J. (2007). The Vertigo of Late Modernity. London, Sage.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/hcs.2013.135
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
New articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
This site is published by the University Library System, University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.